Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ya-Hsuan Lee vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lee vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Ya-Hsuan Lee vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lee 0 - 1 Inglis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lee has won 43.83% of points on their second serve, while Inglis has won 46.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lee, in recent form, has won 60.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 55.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.6% and 41.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lee has saved 50.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 56.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lee has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Inglis winning 59.32% (W/L 35/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.78% of matches (W/L 26/ 19), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 32/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lee winning 0 times and Inglis being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 0 and Inglis winning 2. The last match between Lee and Inglis was at the W25 Osaka, 13-04-2023, Second, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lee and Inglis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lee winning 0 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lee winning 0, and Inglis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lee has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.83 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 287.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lee has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lee has converted 51.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 47.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
349
Rank
186
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
237
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (311-218)
Career Total W/L
59% (251-175)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
67% (20-10)
$12,910
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ya-Hsuan Lee | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (31/52) | 62% (34/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 56% (19/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (8/21) | 62% (13/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (23/55) | 48% (25/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ya-Hsuan Lee | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 67% (20/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (43/38) | 64% (47/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (390/373) | 56% (390/309) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 63% (12/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 146 | 137 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:50 | 1:55:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.94 | 299.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1486/2369) | 61% (1317/2164) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (910/1486) | 66% (873/1317) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (387/883) | 47% (397/847) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (152/295) | 47% (141/299) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1133/2402) | 47% (1101/2361) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (19/13) | 69% (18/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (19/33) | 67% (20/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (10/15) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 79% (19/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 21% (19/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 45% (11/5) |
Ya-Hsuan Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Miho Kuramochi
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
80 of
112)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
74 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Zongyu Li
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Han Shi
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
120)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lee Vs Inglis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
